Before 2019, many organizations used inconsistent FMEA approaches. AIAG and VDA merged their methodologies into a single framework that improves traceability, cross-functional collaboration, and risk prioritization.
The most significant change was the replacement of traditional Risk Priority Number (RPN) thinking with Action Priority (AP) and the introduction of a formal seven-step workflow.
| Step | Purpose | Main Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Planning & Preparation | Define scope and objectives | Project plan |
| 2. Structure Analysis | Break down the system or process | Structure tree |
| 3. Function Analysis | Define functions and requirements | Function network |
| 4. Failure Analysis | Identify failure chains | Failure structure |
| 5. Risk Analysis | Assess Severity, Occurrence and Detection | Action Priority |
| 6. Optimization | Reduce risk | Action plan |
| 7. Results Documentation | Maintain evidence and traceability | Released FMEA |
This step defines scope, boundaries, assumptions, team composition, customer requirements and timing.
Common mistake: starting failure analysis before defining scope.
Related reading: FMEA Team Roles
Structure Analysis breaks the product or process into logical elements.
Example for machining:
Every later failure mode must be traceable back to this structure.
Define what each element must do.
Weak function:
Strong function:
Failure modes become meaningful only when functions are clearly defined.
Failure Analysis connects failure causes, failure modes and effects.
| Cause | Failure Mode | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Tool wear | Hole oversize | Loose fit during assembly |
| Incorrect torque | Fastener loosening | Noise and vibration |
| Material defect | Housing crack | Water ingress |
This is where most weak FMEAs become generic and lose value.
Risk Analysis evaluates:
These ratings determine Action Priority.
Optimization focuses on reducing risk through prevention and detection improvements.
| Problem | Weak Action | Strong Action |
|---|---|---|
| Tool wear | Increase inspection | Implement tool-life monitoring |
| Assembly defect | Tell operators to be careful | Add poka-yoke fixture |
| Missing component | Visual reminder | Barcode verification |
Results Documentation ensures traceability between FMEA, Control Plan, APQP activities and audit evidence.
Related reading:
How AIAG-VDA 7-Step Method connects to other FMEA concepts, standards, examples and software.
Three tiers, automatically derived from the Qhubio knowledge graph. The tier containing this guide is highlighted.
Curated next steps — methodology guides, worked examples, and the relevant tool.
Move from theory to a working FMEA. Same methodology, three entry points depending on how you want to start.
Qhubio applies the AIAG-VDA methodology automatically — no Excel formulas, no inconsistent rating scales, no scattered spreadsheets.
Generate your first FMEAHelp us improve Qhubio. Analytics help us understand which FMEA features are useful, which pages need improvement, and where users encounter problems. No advertising. No selling personal data. See our Cookie Policy.